Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing

We all have our little darlings, words, lines, scenes, chapters, that we love. Then a critique partner or an editor comes along and slashes a line right through them. Feedback is provided, such as: episodic, redundant, doesn’t have anything to do with the story, takes away from the immediacy of the scene … and many, many other disheartening reasons why the darlings have to be destroyed.

As the one who gave birth to the darling, an author often attempts to do everything she can to save them. She holds them up and claims their cuteness, their intelligence, even their entertainment value. Even when she can’t explain how they are necessary to the story, an author might cling to them with all her might.

The truth is, in fiction, we can’t afford to waste a single word. They must be integral to the story, or they must be slashed.

When examining a manuscript for these darlings, it is good to approach them with that thought in mind. Are they necessary or is it just something that the author likes?

If it’s something that the author likes, then there are two options: make it integral to the story or take it out.

Is the author holding on to characters that really don’t belong? There are three options: rework the story to make them count, save them for another novel, or get rid of them.

Is the scene/location a “must-have” even though it’s a rabbit trail for a million reasons that only the author knows? Two options exist: Get the bunny on the right trail and make the scene/location necessary to the story, or stop chasing the rabbit and stay on the right path.

Are the words just perfect prose whose loss would be a disservice to humanity? One option here. Take the first step in getting over yourself and delete it.

I know this is some tough talk, but as one who loves to hold on to my own darling words, scenes, and chapters, sometimes it takes tough love to help me to get rid of them.

Happy editing.

Related Posts:

  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing Last week, I mentioned style sheets for authors and editors. This week, I thought it would be fun to give you an exercise to determine some of the smaller details that can be included in your style sheet by offering a gramma… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing My husband and I have experienced an event that was sitcom worthy. Often we sit around and laugh about the mass exodus from Florida that occurred with the near hit of the monster hurricane, Floyd. We left town with three car… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing I mentioned recently, that I’ve been pondering why some writers couldn’t care less about the ins and outs of grammar and punctuation. In fact, some authors tend to view grammar and punctuation as a rudimentary part of the ar… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing The word characterization is tossed around quite a bit in a writer’s world, but what does it really mean? Characterization is what makes a character who he is. An author draws upon several aspects to develop a character: … Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing Some authors believe all passive sentences are bad. They’ve heard the rule that all forms of to be are to be cut from their manuscripts. Let’s explain and debunk that myth. Passive sentences are those in which the sub… Read More

1 comment: