Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing

Lately, when reading, italicized internal monologue jumps right out at me. Literally. The words jar me, and I’m sure they jar the majority of readers. Why? How can I put this?
  • Internal monologue is shown via italicization. The reader is going along in the normal font, and then it slants. Then it returns to normal. Then it slants again.
  • When used in third-person viewpoint the italics are joined by a sudden switch to first-person viewpoint.
  • When used in a first-person viewpoint, the italics have no reason for being there. Italics announce to the reader that the point of view wasn’t deep enough in the first place.
  • Internal thought is used as a shortcut in fiction, and as such, it becomes a tool for telling rather than showing.

As with all style issues in fiction, overuse of italics is tiresome and ineffective and should be used sparingly. I believe that internal thought has two functions: 1) to place emphasis on an important thought; or 2) for relevant silent prayer.

When self-editing for areas where telling versus showing are the focus, italicized internal monologue is a great place for an author to search.

In the evaluation of these areas, here are some questions that should be asked:
  • Is the internal monologue important enough that it needs special emphasis (and if that is true more than twice in a manuscript, the author may want to determine another way to get this emphasis across)?
  • If internal monologue is included in a scene, can the first paragraph be set stronger to clearly define the point-of-view character and to allow his or her thoughts to flow in the narrative, drawing the reader closer to that character?
  • If the story is being told in first-person point of view and internal monologue is being used does that mean that the first person, point-of-view character’s voice is not strong enough for the reader to realize that the thoughts are flowing from that character into the narrative?

Internal monologue has a place in fiction. It can be used to great effect, but only if it used minimally and for the greatest impact.

Happy editing.

Related Posts:

  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing Recently, I asked fellow writers what advice they’d been given from other sources concerning opening scenes and what not to do. I’d like to share what they told me and offer my opinions on those “rules.” The very first ru… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing When you look at this picture, what do you see? Do you see a picture of a beautiful, but shy, younger woman or do you see the old hag-like woman? Sometimes the words in the sentences we write are similar to this illusi… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing Voice: what is it that distinguishes an author in the vast world of publishing? Many forums are built on this question. Experts offer their opinion, but the truth is, voice is as elusive a question as why one reader loves a … Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing Lately, a case of style versus aggravation has cropped up in a few pieces of work I have viewed: the "verbless" sentence. I am undecided as to whether authors attempting this form of style are doing so because they are tr… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing Writing a series of novels does not give an author the right to leave the reader dangling mid-plot at the end of any of the books in that series. Whether a compilation of three or ten books is planned, every book should … Read More

2 comments:

  1. You make a strong point and now I want to go back and edit some of my stories...

    ReplyDelete
  2. Betty: Rut-roh. (If you know what I mean).

    ReplyDelete