Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing


Writing a series of novels does not give an author the right to leave the reader dangling mid-plot at the end of any of the books in that series.

Whether a compilation of three or ten books is planned, every book should be written to stand alone. An author should always be mindful that a reader may not pick up book one first. Instead, book three in a series might grab the reader’s attention and send him looking for the first two books.

In the last year, I read two books written in a popular genre, which because of the genre’s very nature, has many similar plots and character names. The first book ended without any plot resolution. Unresolved plots are not the way to this reader’s heart—and I believe many readers would agree.

Almost a year later, I pick up another book by the same author, and the frustration began from the very first page. Characters walked on stage without introduction, plots seemed to have already started before I got into the author’s story world, and I found myself lost and flipping pages to see if I’d missed anything. Still, I continued on because I’m a glutton for punishment. Halfway through the book, I connected the dots and realized that the book in my hand was the second book in the series that had aggravated me previously. The good news: I finally got resolution to the plot. The bad news: I really didn’t much care. The author had two chances to win me over, and she failed.

Authors do not want their readers to complain about their books. So, when writing a series, it is important to self-edit with an eye toward giving each book legs of its own. In other words, even when a plot will resurface in another book in a series, there has to be a definitive end to each plot in the book at hand. A plot that ends with the hero riding off into the sunset while the heroine looks on in tears provides a resolution—albeit unhappy—but there is a promise of another story. Failure to resolve a plot causes a reader to feel cheated of both time and money.

Happy editing.

Related Posts:

  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self Editing I’m not a fan of the word edgy when it refers to Christian fiction. Why does the term bother me? Edgy is a subjective word. What is edgy for some writers is over the edge for some. I find that for some authors edg… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing As discussed in previous posts, a self-editing checklist is often a helpful tool for authors. Today, I’d like to share some words that are often confused, and adding these to your checklist will save you time when self-edit… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing When you look at this picture, what do you see? Do you see a picture of a beautiful, but shy, younger woman or do you see the old hag-like woman? Sometimes the words in the sentences we write are similar to this illusi… Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing Writing a series of novels does not give an author the right to leave the reader dangling mid-plot at the end of any of the books in that series. Whether a compilation of three or ten books is planned, every book should … Read More
  • Tactical Tuesday: Advice for Self-Editing So an author has signed a contract for his work with a publisher and thus begins the editing process of the book he holds most dear. The author is excited to get the edits and to begin making the changes. Then…oh, no…the edi… Read More

2 comments:

  1. Sounds like the Dunes series. I'm a slow learner, so I actually read three of them before giving up on ever getting to a resolution.
    ~Anne

    ReplyDelete
  2. Great post, Fay. And so true. I hate to feel like I'm being forced to buy a second or third book just to have a resolution. Most of the time, I don't.

    ReplyDelete